How Canada Cheats at Diversity

Pictured above are what are touted as a fine example of Canada’s commitment to diversity. Arif Virani and Rahim Jaffer came to Canada as immigrants. While Nenshi was born in Toronto, his parents were also immigrants. And all three are “Muslims.” What a tolerant and progressive country!

Except nothing is what it seems to be.

Arif Virani tabled a piece of legislation called the Online Harms Act (We are to believe there were no shadowy committees authoring it). This would make him the first Attorney General in the entire history of Canada to introduce such blatant restrictions on free speech, complete with Soviet-style Star Chambers to punish those who talk too much.

Naheed Nenshi also happens to be a Freemason, and I once saw the title “Most Worshipful” appended to his name. His party is currently headed by WEF attendee Jagmeet Singh, who was conspicuously silent on the Covid-19 lock-downs and vaccine mandates.

Rahim Jaffer first caught my eye when I noticed him raging in parliament that Canada was not doing enough to combat terrorism post 9/11. Since all “terror” incidents in Canada during that period were street theater to promote the War in Afghanistan, I became suspicious. Jaffer bombed his political career in controversies involving allegations of cocaine and hookers. His wife is another Conservative MP, whose career also bombed in a string of unsavory controversies. She tried to cover up the mistreatment of Afghan detainees during the War with the Taliban.

They look like bad apples. But are they really Muslims? A little digging reveals that they are actually Ismailis, whom mainstream Muslims regard as a dangerous and conspiratorial cult. They constitute less than 1% of all Muslims globally. However, they exhibit disproportionate levels of wealth and power. This group gets special treatment in Canada, with their leader, the Agha Khan, sometimes addressing the Canadian parliament.

Muslims are expected to give 2.5% of their wealth to the poor every year. However, members of the Ismaili cult are expected to give 12.5% of their wealth each year to cult bigwigs. It is rumored that this is how the Agha Khans have financed their lavish lifestyle for ages. To willingly be a part of such a group, in modern times, and in a Western country, you must either be

1. A deep-pocketed member of the top hierarchy, which happily fleeces and dupes the bottom.
2. A brainwashed member of the bottom. Members at the bottom are usually so self-absorbed in materialist pursuits that they cannot spare five brain cells to figure their way out. And being born into the cult does have some advantages, such as connections for jobs and business. And so they trudge along.

The question is, would an immigrant “Attorney General” coming from such a cult place any importance on Canadian values such a free speech? To the contrary, cults go to extremes to suppress free speech.

Fritz Springmeier, considered to be a leading author on MK-ULTRA mind control, once alleged that the Agha Khan was a mind control “Programmer.”^[1]The Illuminati Formula Used to Create an Undetectable Total Mind Controlled Slave, Cisco Wheeler, Fritz Springmeier, On Demand Publishing, 1996, ASIN B0006QXVU4, ISBN 1-4404-9022-8. Agha Khan is listed under “Appendix-1, The Programmers.” For this allegation to be true, His Highness would have to have physical access to luckless “psychiatric patients” in Western institutions! Imagine the clout.

Digging deeper, we find that all three have a connection to the Ismaili community in Africa. In fact, both Rahim Jaffer and Arif Virani were both born in Kampala, Uganda! Along with other wealthy Gujaratis, they had to leave alongside the white farmers, because Idi Amin saw them as collaborators. But none of the white farmers seem to have been rehabilitated as politicians in Canada. Was there some secret program to rehabilitate rich Ismailis in Canada who had been disadvantaged by Idi Amin?

Digging more deep, we find that Arif Virani is married to a Jain. Many Jains happen to be the shadowy industrial class of India. A Virani also happens to be a Hindu BJP MLA from Gujarat. Then there is Pinky Virani, a Euthanasia advocate in India. Is the name Virani even Indian? It points to Iran, where the Agha Khan was also based during the rule of the Qajars.

In other words, you may immigrate to Canada as a colored person. But to make it to parliament as a colored person, you have to be a member of a cult with good ties to British Intelligence. Only Uncle Toms may apply.

Update: Was Arif Virani’s pick for Chief Commissioner of the Canadian Human Rights Commission “Cousin Material?”

Arif Virani recommended a certain Birju Dattani as Chief Commissioner of the Canadian Human Rights Commission. He was all set for a five year term starting 8th August 2024.

Very little is known about Birju Dattani’s personal life. We do know, that like the above three specimen, he is the son of “refugees” from Uganda. What are the odds?

Later during an investigation, the following came out:

Mr. Dattani was also asked why he referred to himself as “Birju M. Dattani” in this instance, but in other instances, he referred to himself as “Mujahid Dattani”. In general, Mr. Dattani explained that his name at birth was “Birju Rajnikant Dattani” but he does not use “Rajnikant” as a middle name. Instead, since he was nineteen years old, he has used the name “Mujahid”. Mr. Dattani adopted the name “Mujahid” when he embraced a Muslim identity. Mr. Dattani also explained that “Mujahid” was a rough translation of his first name “Birju”, which is Sanskrit.

In other words, is he a shape-shifter? Sometimes Hindu, sometimes Muslim. We saw the same oddness with the Virani surname. It seems that Dattani’s shape-shifting habits caught up to him when some Jewish keyboard warriors discovered that he was earlier calling for a Caliphate in a 2015 Speaking Engagement on the Middle East. And now, he has resigned.

Suppose he did have some kind of link to Arif Virani via the Ismaili community or the Uganda connection, this would be problematic, as those singled out by the Online Harms Act would naturally approach the Human Rights Commissioner. Do you see where this is going?

It is also pertinent to mention that on 14th December 2021, Birju Dattani and Amna Bhatti delivered a webinar on behalf of the The Yukon Human Rights Commission (YHRC) on some of the issues regarding the draconian vaccine-mandates and proof of vaccination policies with respect to the Yukon Human Rights Act. It is pertinent to mention this particular piece from the presentation, which was voiced by Dattani himself:

The Commission will not accept complaints regarding opposition to vaccination based on personal preference or personal belief, or any other reason that is not related to a ground protected under the Act (Pelletier v 1226309 Alberta Ltd. o/a Community Natural Foods, 2021 AHRC 192, para. 32).

In other words, the Canadian Human Rights Commission cannot, in most cases, be used to challenge the draconian vaccine mandates and opposition to dangerous and lethal vaccines. This presentation seems to shoebox opposition to vaccine mandates on Human Rights Grounds to some very specific instances, which would not apply to most people.